EnviroSpin Watch

Please do visit.....

The 'A Parliament of Things' web site is now fully up-and-running, with four big contributions on the first full contents' page, 'Nature and Society'. Many more contents' pages will be added during the next couple of weeks.

I do hope you can find a moment to visit. There is a Guestbook for both private and public comment.

Philip, enjoying putting together a pukka web site, as well as doing his daily blog. "I think I now deserve two cups of coffee?" Self-indulgence all round. "And two biscuits?" "No, a banana, dear. It's better for you!" (Sigh!).

Whinash: I was not angry until now.....

The proposed wind farm at Whinash in Cumbria, on the very borders of the iconic Lake District National Park, is an environmentalist's folly too far. By supporting it, Friends of the Earth (FoE) and Greenpeace lose any credibility to be taken seriously as organisations defending our British landscape and environments. Indeed, I now see such organisations as intrinsically dangerous to the true aims of conservation and landscape care.

In the name of an arrogant, ill-thought out, set of dogmas and theologies, these misguided and misinformed souls will sacrifice anything, even landscape beauty, peace and wilderness. And we should never undervalue the importance of 'wilderness' for the long-term psychological health of an increasingly-urban world. People are fully aware that the British landscape is largely a product of human action, but they crave open areas where they can feel the wind free on their face and where there are no overt signs of an industrialised planet.

And anyway, wind farms for what?

Trying to plug Britain's looming energy gap with a proliferation of wind farms is like trying to solve the pensions' crisis by putting a tax on babies' nappies. It stinks.

All 'renewable' sources of energy together contribute but 4% of Britain's energy needs and they will toil to achieve 10%, especially when one takes into account the fact that the wind fraction requires a constant back-up from either fossil fuels or nuclear power. Moreover, the ecological footprint of wind farms is enormous. Environmentalists would tolerate no other industrial development that gobbles up over 150,000 acres of wilderness just to replace one conventional/nuclear power station.

And it is all aeolian ephemerality anyway. The real energy question is how on earth is Britain going to generate its core 93% of energy! The answer, of course, is a mix of clean coal, natural gas, and nuclear power.

With Whinash, the time has come to be counted. This willful despoliation by big energy companies of our last-remaining countryside for effectively no gain would normally be an anathema to any sensible Green and it has to stopped.

The battle cry, 'Say No to Whinash!', must sound throughout the land, from Peter Rabbit (himself) to Melvyn Bragg (for it is he), until we halt the outrageous sacrifice of our heritage.

Whinash is a wind farm too far. I was not angry until now.....

Philip, off for a soothing coffee. Grrrrrrr!

Philip goes serious.....

Just to forewarn you: my new, and additional, fully-fledged web site will go live very soon. Here is the 'Home Page', already up and running: 'A Parliament of Things' (note the posh .info URL: http://parliamentof things.info).

This new site will carry more heavy weight essays, taken from my publications, and I hope that it will complement the lighter moments and frippery of 'EnviroSpin Watch'.

Philip, excited by a 'hybrid future' - and when you visit the new site, you'll see what I mean! Just take La Tour! A good claret is in order tonight, I muse.